Doctor
Who finales (since 2005 at any
rate) tend to be large and epic, often with the fate of the universe
at stake. Series 9’s finale
took the Doctor and Clara to Gallifrey and to the end of the universe
itself. Way back in Series 5,
the entire universe had to be rebooted to save it. Series 10 looks
set to end quite epically, though perhaps at not quite so large a
scale. So far, it is more in the style of the Series 1 finale, which
only involved the fate of one solar system rather than the entire
universe.
But
the entire universe doesn’t need to be under threat for the stakes
to be high, and the stakes are certainly high in “World Enough and
Time”, the first part of the two-part Series 10 finale by Steven
Moffat. While “World Enough and Time” certainly bears many
similarities to first parts of previous finales, it also stands
apart. It is certainly one of the darkest Doctor Who
stories (not just finales), filled with an unrelenting sense of
impending doom. Clocks are
seen ticking forwards in this episode, yet the feel nevertheless is
one of a countdown—a countdown to a terrible catastrophe.
Catastrophe is certainly a hallmark of many Doctor Who
stories, but rarely does it feel so tangible and so close—not just
close to the characters, but to the viewers as well.
There’s
a lot to unpack in “World Enough and Time”. It’s a dense script
based around some complex scientific topics (and in typical science
fiction fashion, not entirely accurately portrayed) and
also has a heavy reliance on the show’s past (which is not always
to its benefit). Of course, the next episode (the actual Series 10
finale episode) will likely have an effect (either good, bad, or
both) on how many of the elements of “World Enough and Time”
ultimately work, but looked at on its own, without knowledge of what
is to come next (beyond the “Next Time” trailer), it is a hugely
enjoyable—if highly morbid—episode that keeps me captivated until
the end and has left me eager for the next. Yet it is also a highly
problematic episode that also gets a little too caught up in its own
self-references.
“World
Enough and Time” has one of the most unique titles for any Doctor
Who story, which, for me
personally, is an initial draw. Doctor Who
titles tend to follow the pattern of “The ____ of the ____” or
are just a single word (possibly accompanied by an article or
adjective). Just looking at Series 10, we have “The Pilot”, “Smile”,
“Thin Ice”, “Oxygen”,
“Extremis”,
“The Pyramid at the End of the World”,
“The Lie of the Land”,
“Empress of Mars”, and “The Eaters of Light”.
Only “Knock Knock” doesn’t
fully fit the pattern, though it fits it more closely than does
“World Enough and Time”. At first glance, “World Enough and
Time” doesn’t seem to make a lot of sense and thus immediately
grabs one’s attention.
The
title comes from the poem, “To His Coy Mistress” by 17th-century
poet Andrew Marvell. It’s a phrase that has influenced
the title to more than a few books and stories over the years. As
Missy’s name is short for Mistress, the meaning of “World Enough
and Time” starts to become clearer. The poem begins:
Had we but world enough and time,This coyness, lady, were no crime.
In
the remainder (which you can read and/or listen to in its entirety
here),
the narrator attempts to
seduce his coy lady by
talking about what things would be like if they had infinite time,
but since they don’t, they should just give in to their passions
now (or rather, that she
should give in to his passions—it’s a very one-sided
relationship).
Moffat
is clearly using the reference to the poem to parallel with the
Doctor and Missy/the Master’s relationship. While the Doctor/Master
relationship is not a sexual one (that we know of, at any rate), it
is one that has long involved both sides trying to tempt the other to
switch over. Currently, the Doctor believes thoroughly that he can
redeem Missy by helping her to see the true beauty of the universe.
Meanwhile, there is also the beginning of a similar struggle, with
Missy’s previous incarnation trying to tempt her back onto the path
of evil.
Using
the specific phrase “world enough and time”, the title also
obviously alludes to the colony ship being sufficient as its own
world and the effect of the black hole on the passage of time. Steven
Moffat loves stories that play with time (though he’s been very
restrained in this regard this series until now), so a title that can
be made to allude to gravitational time dilation is likely too great
a lure to resist (and I don’t blame him in this regard).
Some
people have pointed out a later part of the poem that might also have
some relevance: “I would/Love you ten years before the flood.”
“Before the Flood” is, of
course, an episode from Series 9. In particular, the episode contains
a thorough description of the Bootstrap Paradox, which could possibly
be a hint to how events in “World Enough and Time” are resolved
next episode (or not resolved, as the case may be, given the nature
of the type of paradox). I don’t know if this is necessarily the
case, but it’s an interesting idea. There’s no doubt that there
is a lot of meaning hidden in this episode’s unusual title.
“World
Enough and Time” is also a heavily self-referential episode—which
itself is a bit of a time reference.
It is packed with knowing winks to fans and references to the show’s
long and dense history. Missy’s insistence on calling herself
Doctor Who and that it’s the Doctor’s real name is a reference to
ever-heated fan debates about the same topic (spurred on by the fact
that the credits from 1963 to 1981 and in 2005 listed the character
as “Dr. Who” or “Doctor Who”—not to mention stories like
“The Name of the Doctor”
focusing on the question, “Doctor who?”). Her reference to the
Bill and Nardole as, “My disposables, Exposition and Comic Relief,”
works as criticism of the Doctor, but also as meta-criticism of the
show itself. The Master refers to the “Genesis of the Cybermen”.
In-world, the Master is
likely drawing on Biblical references to link what is happening to
Operation: Exodus. However, it is also a
real-world reference
to the early 70s story, “Genesis of the Daleks”, which tells the
origins of the Daleks. There has long been a desire amongst fans for
there to be a story which does the same for the Cybermen. And there
are
more examples of such
meta-textual references.
In
fact, I think the episode overdoes it, particularly in the multitude
of references to the show’s past that are not easily followed
without some knowledge of the past. One of the things I’ve really
liked about Series 10 is that it has gotten away from the show’s
recent tendency to reference its own past to excess. Of course, the
past shouldn’t be ignored, and indeed, Series 10 has had nods to
the past—such as the photos of River and Susan in the Doctor’s
office, or the appearance of Alpha Centauri—but until now, these
nods have been elements that work in the story whether the viewer is
familiar with their history or not. “World Enough and Time”,
however, floods the viewers with references to the past that require
knowledge of them—to
the point that it often has to engage in the very exposition Missy
criticises in order to explain them. For
example, there’s the
history of the Doctor and the Master/Missy, including the
reappearance of John Simm’s incarnation of the Master.
But
while the history of the Doctor and the Master is explained to the
viewers, the return of the Mondasian Cybermen is framed in such a way
as to expect viewers to already know what they are. “It’s a
Cyberman! A Mondasian Cyberman!” the Doctor exclaims shortly after
Missy is surprised
to learn that the
people on the ship are from Mondas. Many viewers will gasp in
surprised recognition (or maybe not surprise, since publicity for
this series spoiled this quite some time ago), but many other viewers
are likely to wonder, “What’s Mondas? Why is a Modasian Cyberman
more special than a regular Cyberman?” A show like Doctor
Who needs to be cognizant of the
fact that there are over 800 episodes comprising nearly 300 stories.
Viewers can’t be expected to recognise them all—especially a
reference to a story from fifty years ago.
Of
course, I can’t deny that, to a fan like myself, the
reveal of the Mondasian Cybermen is a moment of pure joy.
“Mondasian Cybermen” refers to the original appearance of the
Cybermen in the 1966 story, “The Tenth Planet” (note that until
“World Enough and Time”, they’ve never actually been called
“Mondasian Cybermen” on screen). Over the years, the Cybermen’s
appearance has changed considerably, becoming more and more metallic
to the point where in the last decade, they have looked like entirely
mechanical robots. But their earliest appearance had a more
flexible look to it—even
having completely organic hands. Of course, special effects
technology at the time resulted in extremely heavy, unwieldy suits,
which necessitated the first change in appearance in their
next serial. For “World Enough and Time”, their design has been
very slightly altered to fit
what modern-day effects are capable of, yet they remain very true to
the originals’ look. They even have the same creepy sing-song-like
voice of the originals.
Using
the Mondasian Cybermen in the episode not only allows for that
“Genesis of the Cybermen” story, but also allows for a much
better visualisation of the body horror that is at the basis of the
Cybermen. While many Cybermen stories have included humans being
converted into Cybermen, their solid metal bodies have placed a
distance between the original person and the resulting Cyberman. It’s
easy for viewers to dissociate one from the other. Yet the Mondasian
Cybermen have a far more human-like appearance, making this
dissociation more difficult. Adding in the intermediary stage of the
“special patients” makes
it virtually impossible.
And
there’s no doubt that the build-up to the creation of the first
Cyberman is morbid and horrifying, and it’s helped by the bleak
appearance of the hospital. The plight of the patients—with their
pain being addressed by simply turning down the volume and muting
them, or later the headpiece
that “won’t stop you feeling pain, but will stop you caring about
it”—is tangible and
heart-wrenching. Like the best Doctor Who
horror, it takes something very real—patients in pain in a
hospital—and makes it into something utterly terrifying.
Of
course, adding to the horror is the fact that it is also happening to
a character that we have come to know and care about: Bill. First,
she is shot (in a manner that is incredibly gruesome for Doctor
Who, resulting in a hole being
blasted through her chest); then she is partially converted and has
to carry around a heavy metallic add-on for what would appear to be
several years. Finally, she is converted into what would seem to be
the very first full Cyberman—a fact we are reminded of, not just
because she says, “I am Bill Potts,” but also by the final
zoom-in to her face behind the silver covering and her shedding of a
tear (that intriguingly comes out the front in the same location as
where later versions of the Cybermen have a tear-shaped extension to
their eye).
The
final cliff-hanger moment is an unbelievable tangle of emotions. It’s
horrifying, thrilling, heart-wrenching, exciting, and a ton of other
things. It’s incredibly effective storytelling. Unfortunately, it’s
also rather problematic.
Bill
is only the second/third (depending on whether you count Mickey)
non-white companion and the first/second (depending on whether you
count Jack Harkness) LGBTQ companion. It is an unfortunate fact that
POC and LGBTQ characters are subjected to a higher proportion of
violence than straight, cis,
white characters in media. There’s a reason why “black guy dies first” and
“dead lesbian syndrome”
are tropes. While they may not always die first anymore, they still
have a tendency to die—often saving the straight, white characters.
It’s somewhat disheartening to see something like this happening on
Doctor Who, especially
since in the last couple of series, Doctor Who
has been making huge strides forward in representation and diversity.
It is also quite surprising in an episode that is otherwise so
self-aware in its criticism of the show’s own shortcomings.
There’s
also the fact that Bill is essentially “fridged”
here as motivation to propel the Doctor and Missy’s story—to
provide the tension in whether or not they can ever truly be friends.
On top of that, throughout the story, Bill has no agency whatsoever.
She doesn’t want to be part of Missy’s test, but the Doctor
thrusts it upon her. She is shot early on and placed in a hospital
that she can’t leave without dying and is left waiting there for
literally years for the Doctor to show up. All this is to provide
motivation for the Doctor to come rescue her, although he gets there
too late.
Now,
I’m not saying that POC and LGBTQ characters should never have
anything bad happen to them, but there should be a better balance
than there is, and it’s unfortunate that
Steven Moffat and the rest of the production crew didn’t consider
this before going forward with this direction to the story—or if
they did consider it, that they then didn’t think it a large enough
concern to come up with something different.
Of
course, this may all be undone next episode. In fact, I fully expect
it to be. Moffat never really kills off lead characters. If they do
die, they either come back or they get their death delayed
indefinitely so they’re effectively not dead after all. I fully
expect that something “timey wimey” will happen that will undo
what has happened to Bill, perhaps involving a Bootstrap Paradox if
the line in “To His Coy Mistress” is really some sort of clue.
However, even if it is undone, it doesn’t change the fact that Bill
has still had that violence enacted upon her.
Also,
if it is undone, it creates another problem, where yet again, there
are no consequences for actions in Doctor Who.
This has been a major problem throughout Steven Moffat’s run and it
is perpetuated every time someone comes back to life. All
sense of threat is completely removed, and that’s a shame because
this episode is full of threat. It is also absolutely riveting
television. But being really, really good does not excuse it of its
problems. It’s possible to enjoy something and still acknowledge
its problems.
Of
course, it may seem a bit early to be criticising this since I
haven’t seen the next episode yet and Moffat might have come up
with an ingenious solution that removes all the problems completely.
However, that kind of argument can be applied to any episode since a
future episode can always change things. The story here may not be
complete, but there are valid reasons to critique it on its own.
All
that said, since there are problems either way, it
would probably be best for her to survive as the problematic tropes
of her dying ultimately outweigh the consequences problem. I
also
really, really like her. She’s such a great character and one of my
favourite companions.
Putting
all that aside for now, there are a lot of other great things about
“World Enough and Time”. For a start, there’s Missy—two of
them! This is the first ever multi-Master story. There have been many
multi-Doctor stories over the years, but there’s never been a
multi-Master one. It would have been difficult to do during the
original series’ run due to Roger Delgado’s death. Since then,
Anthony Ainley has also passed away and there haven’t been
a whole lot of other
incarnations of the Master to bring together. However, it was bound
to happen eventually.
For
the record, I loved John Simm’s Master during David Tennant’s
time and his performance is just as great now. It’s a thrill to see
him back, and I think his version of the Master is the perfect one to
put opposite Michelle Gomez’s Missy. I will be honest and admit
that I did not catch on that Mister Razor was the Master until after
he betrays Bill, even though I knew John Simm was appearing in this
episode (honestly, the trailer for this episode was much too
spoilery—although admittedly,
spoilers can enhance enjoyment).
On repeated viewings, it’s very much possible to recognise the
Master’s mannerisms behind the disguise, making this a truly
masterful (pun intended) performance from John Simm.
As
well as being a great performance from the real-world actor, we also
see how good a performer the Master can be, as he takes in Bill and
pretends to be her friend for several years before ultimately
betraying her. Intriguingly, this does kind of mean that Bill has
spent more time being the Master’s companion (albeit
unknowingly) than the
Doctor’s. I have to wonder if this will have any effect later
(assuming she regains her humanity).
The
appearance of John Simm’s Master has another purpose as well.
As I mentioned earlier, his presence provides an opposite temptation
for Missy to
the one the Doctor provides. Where the Doctor pulls Missy towards
goodness, her previous incarnation pulls her towards evil. The Doctor
and the Master are like an angel and a devil on her shoulders
attempting to control which way she goes.
What
I find remarkable is that Missy really does seem to be trying (if not
fully successfully) to reform. While it may yet turn out to be some
devious deception on her part, even the Master says that he’s
worried for his future. I think this is a fascinating direction to
take the character. While I don’t think she should actually achieve
redemption, her trying makes for something completely new to do with
her character.
I
have purposely left the opening moments of the episode till last to
discuss, since the opening scene is clearly a flash-forward to later
events. Given that Peter Capaldi is staying in the role of the Doctor
until this year’s Christmas special, I have to wonder if this is
another fake out, a flash-forward really far (in which case, what’s
it doing in this episode?), or something else entirely. Perhaps next
episode is not the conclusion to the story and it actually concludes
in the Christmas special? Or maybe the Christmas special somehow
takes place during these two episodes? Steven Moffat has said that
the regeneration is going to be unlike any other regeneration, so who
knows?
Regardless
of how it plays out, however, I think it’s impact has been
diminished by the fake regeneration in “The Lie of the Land”.
It’s a bit like “The Boy Who Cried Wolf”. We’re less likely
to believe it to be real. Honestly, when I first watched the opening,
my hopes for the episode sank quite a bit. Thankfully, the episode
turned out to be far better than I began to suspect. That said, I
still think the opening scene is completely unnecessary and doesn’t
add anything to the episode. It serves no purpose other than to tease
the audience with a sort of
false tension (whether the regeneration is real or not). The episode
would be better without it.
And
so I wait with baited breath to see “The Doctor Falls”. I do have
some worries. Steven Moffat is much better at set-ups than he is at
resolutions. However, on its own, “World Enough and Time” has
some problems, but it’s still an extremely good episode of Doctor
Who. It has its eerie and
terrifying genesis of the Cybermen, John Simm and Michelle Gomez
turning in electrifying performances, and more. No matter how the
resolution turns out, it can’t change that.
Doctor Who is an incredible series and I haven't missed a single episode of it. I follow your posts keenly to get more info on it and to get some authentic spoilers.
ReplyDelete