Doctor
Who is a show capable of various
different styles, from light and campy to dramatic to dark and
foreboding. Yet even at its darkest, it always has a sense of humour.
It might be the Doctor cracking macabre jokes in last week's “Into the Dalek” (“Top
layer, if you want to say a few words”), or the zany antics of this
week's “Robot of Sherwood”. It's somewhat fitting that, after a
couple of rather dark episodes, the series should turn now to a
light-hearted romp with Robin Hood
and his Merry Men. It helps
to show that, while Peter Capaldi's Doctor may be a darker, more
serious Doctor, this is still Doctor Who
and it can still do anything it wants.
Alas,
even Doctor Who can
take it too far sometimes,
and “Robot of Sherwood” is an
example. I would never want Doctor Who
to lose its humour and it absolutely is possible to have a silly,
fun, and ludicrous story that works. Doctor Who
has certainly done it many times. “Robot of Sherwood”, however,
tries too hard to be funny, and it does so at the expense of
character. There are
some genuinely funny moments in
the episode, and Peter Capaldi and Tom Riley (who plays Robin Hood)
have some brilliant moments together. Their rivalry is very
entertaining to watch. Yet the episode frequently
devolves into slapstick and nonsense, resulting in a story that,
while entertaining,
is ultimately unsatisfying. It's
not a terrible episode and it has its moments, but it
could have—and should have—been so much more.
The
biggest problem with “Robot of Sherwood” is its cast of cardboard
cut-out characters, which
heavily detract from the experience. There's a good story here that
can't quite rise up to its potential. The only guest character to get
any real attention is Robin Hood himself, and to be fair, his
development is much better than what other
“celebrity historicals” usually
give their guest historical personages. Unlike Winston
Churchill in “Victory of the Daleks” (also
by writer Mark Gatiss) or
Richard Nixon in “The
Impossible Astronaut”/”Day of the Moon”, Robin
actually has some
depth of character and starts
to feel like a real person.
We learn
that his merry, laughing persona is just a façade to hide a troubled
soul underneath, and we get
to see him react in real human ways (particularly through his
interactions with the Doctor).
This does sometimes get
undermined by the slapstick humour which manages to dehumanize him at
points (such as the archery competition, which I'll discuss shortly),
but it's nice to see an attempt to give
him some depth.
The
other characters fare much worse. The Merry Men are nothing more than
the punchlines for jokes and the only thing separating the Sheriff
from a pantomime villain is that he never actually twirls his
moustache (that said, Ben Miller has a great presence in the role and
looks so uncannily like Anthony Ainley that one half expects the
Sheriff to turn out to actually
be the Master). The ending
twist with Marion is the worst example. I
find myself completely unable to come up with even one adjective to
describe her personality with. She does nothing of any consequence in
the entire episode, and then...Surprise! She was Marion all along,
and she and Robin have a happy reunion. She exists as nothing more
than an ill-defined motivating factor for Robin (which
really doesn't help with the presentation of women in the Steven
Moffat's Doctor Who,
something already quite problematic). Honestly, she would work far
better in her role if she never appeared at all and was just someone
Robin desperately hoped to reunite with one day. That, too, would
have its own problematic aspects (and leave Clara the only female
character in the story—which she practically is anyway), but at
least it would be better than what we get.
The
best comedy is
character-driven, yet “Robot of Sherwood” seems to sacrifice
character in favour of slapstick with scenes like Little John's
introduction or the archery competition. The Little John scene
produces a chuckle but then falls flat because John never becomes a
character (he gets about one line after that). The archery
competition is an example of taking things too far. Splitting the
arrow is an iconic moment in the Robin Hood story and, naturally,
needed to be included here. Having the Doctor then split Robin's
arrow (especially with the reveal at the end that the Doctor cheated)
is a great way to “up” this moment. But it really shouldn't have
gone any further than that. Having Robin then
split the Doctor's arrow,
then the Doctor split Robin's again (and
by bouncing it off a knight's armour in the process),
and then Robin split the Doctor's without even looking at
where he's firing takes the
scene out of the realm of the funny and
into the realm of the absurd.
Yes, the absurd happens
regularly on
Doctor Who, but
presentation and context are important. If Robin were to suddenly
display the ability to fly, we would expect the story to provide some
sort of context or explanation—even in Doctor Who—in
order for us to accept it. This is the same sort of situation. The
comedy falls flat because the episode never provides the context to
allow for suspension of disbelief, and
in doing so, it dehumanizes Robin, making him seem to actually be the
robot the Doctor believes him to be (if he actually turned out to be
a robot at the end, the scene would work better, although it would
still be over the top).
That
said, there certainly are funny moments in the episode. Indeed, the
best ones stem from the rivalry between the Doctor and Robin. I
love the moments while they are prisoners together, each trying to
outdo the other and prove to Clara that he's the better man. These
moments work because they're character-driven moments (and because
Capaldi and Riley so brilliantly perform their roles). They're the
only parts of the story where Robin starts to feel like a real
character. It's a shame we don't get to see more variety of character
moments for Robin, which would allow him to become a more fleshed-out
character.
I'm
also happy to see that Clara continues to be a consistent character
in this story. It doesn't really do anything to develop her any
further, but she at least remains the person we've seen in the
previous two episodes. She doesn't actually do a whole lot in this
episode, but despite that, manages to accomplish more than the other
characters. I love that Robin and the Doctor's rivalry results in the
jailer identifying Clara as the real brains of the operation. It's
another genuinely funny, character-driven moment. Clara's subsequent
manipulation of the Sheriff is another
brilliant scene, and while the Sheriff may not
be a particularly well-developed character, I
can't deny that this scene
grants him one of the greatest lines ever spoken: “For Nottingham
is not enough... After this, Derby... then Lincoln, and after
Lincoln...THE WORLD!”
I
also like that the Doctor is
not all-knowing in this story. He makes a major misjudgement early on
and takes quite a while to realize and admit his mistake. Even when
it starts to become clear to him that Robin is not a robot, he still
clings to his insistence that Robin can't be real by coming up with
the idea that Robin is in collusion with the Sheriff—just an
invention to give the common people false hope. We get to see the
Doctor being fallible.
This
also continues this season's examination of whether the Doctor is a
“good” man with its deconstruction of what makes a hero and
whether storybook heroes can truly exist. It
doesn't do it as well as “Into the Dalek”, partially because it
feels tacked on and it's
really not very
subtle about it—especially
Robin's somewhat
fourth-wall-breaking line, “And remember Doctor, I'm just as real
as you are.” This
examination of heroes would work so much better if the episode
actually examined Robin's relationship with the world around him
more—the actual mediaeval world rather than the storybook version
of Sherwood Forest (complete with throwaway line to explain it) we
get.
In
the end, “Robot of Sherwood” is a light piece of fluff,
reasonably entertaining, and
has some genuinely funny moments.
I just feel that it could
have done more—more with its deconstruction of heroes, more with
developing Robin and his
surroundings. It makes starts
in these directions, but keeps getting sidetracked with its need to
be funny. It tries hard, but
funny doesn't come from trying. It comes naturally from the
characters and how they react to the situations they're in. Without
strong characters, the comedy just isn't as good. “Robot of
Sherwood” is, ultimately, not satisfying.
Hmm, curious. To me the Doctor's rivalry with Robin Hood was by far the weakest part of the episode. Maybe that's just a thing of personal preference, but I like the Doctor when he is an adventurer that's been travelling the galaxy for thousands of years, and still has it in him to be excited by new things, to love and mourn. This mental image of the Doctor was burned strongly into my brain as I watched Tennent's 10, by far my favorite incarnation that I have seen.
ReplyDeleteAccording to my inner logic, then, the Doctor should have been excited at meeting Robin Hood. Should have smiled and marveled and called him fantastic. He still should have investigated to see how and why Robin Hood exists at all, but never be so hostile and offensive towards wither Robin or the Merry Men. From the very first moment that he dueled Robin Hood I was already disappointed - why is my pacifist, clever, enthusiastic Doctor acting like a hothead from the Middle Ages?
Additionally, Clara here continues to be empowered not as her own person, but at the expense of the Doctor. In order for her to seem clever, the Doctor has to seem like an idiot. This continues what was started in the previous episode, where Clara had to teach the Doctor to think (not to feel, which is what companions usually do) in a way similar to how a teacher would instruct an 8 year old child - her exact words were "what did we learn today?". In this episode, the Doctor was so busy trying to one-up Robin Hood that he was reduced to a blubbering moron, which is why Clara was identifyed as smarter (is she seriously supposed to be smarter than a 2000 years old genius? really?).
I can understand where you're coming from if you're looking at it from the perspective of what Tennant's Doctor would do. He absolutely would be all giddy at meeting Robin Hood. However, the Doctor's always been an egotist. The tenth Doctor had better people skills than the twelfth has, but even the tenth was full of himself. He could praise an ally for being brilliant one moment and then immediately remind everyone that he was even more brilliant. He just did it with a smile which would put people off their guard.
DeleteThe twelfth Doctor is not the tenth Doctor, however. Unfortunately, the eleventh was not a big contrast with the tenth, and I think that's created the misunderstanding that there's much less variation between Doctors than there actually is. There are core characteristics (and arrogance is certainly one), but how much they are emphasized can vary considerably. Similarly, their actions and approaches to various situations can vary considerably. The third Doctor, for example, totally would have been up on that log duelling Robin Hood without a second thought. He would probably use his Venusian karate instead of a spoon, but otherwise, the scene would have been very similar. The seventh Doctor, on the other hand, would have merely muttered a cryptic phrase or two, gone from location to location as if he owns the place, and then revealed that he had actually arranged for the robot ship to crash there in the first place so that he could manipulate the Sheriff into joining forces with them simply so that would bring about his eventual doom at the hands of Robin Hood. The variation in the Doctor's different incarnations is part of what makes the show so special, in my opinion.
As for Clara's cleverness coming at the expense of the Doctor's, I disagree. The Doctor isn't being made to look like an idiot. He's acting like an idiot. There's a big difference there. As I said, the Doctor's arrogance has always been a part of his personality, and he's often gone to ridiculous lengths to pretend he's not wrong--to the point of acting childish. In "Into the Dalek", it's not that he can't figure out there are ways to have a good Dalek, it's that his smugness won't let him admit that if you can have a temporarily good Dalek, then maybe you can have a permanently good Dalek. Ultimately, it's his own flaws that also result in his failure to create a good Dalek in that episode. Clara does treat him like a child, but the Doctor is acting childish, something else he does a lot (even Tennant). Sarah Jane Smith once told off the fourth Doctor for acting childish. His response: "Of course I'm acting childish! What's the point of being grown up if you can't act childish once in a while."
And no, Clara's not supposed to actually be smarter than a 2000-year-old genius, and this episode never implies that. However, while the Doctor acts childish again for a while, the jailer identifies Clara as the brains because she's the one acting like an adult.
I can see what you mean with a lot of your points, and I'm sure our perspective on the show is different (I only watched the new show)... All I meant is that I much (much much) preferred the kind of Doctor that Tennant was. It feels more special and unique.
ReplyDeleteWhen I said the Doctor is being made to look like an idiot, I meant by the script - in that scene, he is written as not smart enough to understand the situation. Clara was not trying to make him see through his arrogance, she was teaching him - I urge you to re-watch that scene with this in mind whenever you chance upon that episode again. She is very clearly speaking as a teacher would to a young student. Earlier in that episode we see her in school as a teacher, and later in the episode the Doctor complements he teaching skills. To me it seems clear that the episode was working the "good teacher" angle with her, which required Clara to teach something to the Doctor to prove herself as such.
And as for the jail incident... I don't get how it's better that Clara is not smarter than a 2,000 years old genius, merely more mature.
Thank you for sharing tthis
ReplyDelete