When
I posted my review of Chicks Dig Time Lords, I mentioned that I
had originally hoped to post it along with a review of its follow-up,
Chicks Unravel Time: Women Journey Through Every Season of
Doctor Who, but unfortunately I
had not yet been able to find a copy of Chicks Unravel
Time. Well, not long after
posting that review, my order from Amazon finally came through and my
copy arrived. I then had to find time to read it amidst a busy
schedule that has culminated in a bout with the flu (thus my slowness
with posting, in general, in the last couple weeks). But at last the
reading is done and I have to say that the wait for the book was well
worth it.
As
much as I enjoyed Chicks Dig Time Lords,
I enjoyed Chicks Unravel Time
a great deal more. At the basic conceptual level, the two books are
very similar: a group of women authors write essays about Doctor
Who. But whereas Chicks
Dig Time Lords meanders about
with numerous different styles and topics—from
reminiscences to the position of women in fandom to critical
analysis—and a few
interviews, Chicks Unravel Time
benefits from a more focused approach. Each essay examines one season
(or one aspect of a season) from a critical lens. There is exactly
one essay for each of Seasons One through Twenty-Six, the 1996
television movie, Series One through Six, and the 2009 specials (in
the gap year between series four and five). With its more analytical
bent, there is a lot less reminiscing in these essays and a lot fewer
anecdotal stories. That’s not to say that such things are bad. I
enjoyed the reminiscences in Chicks Dig Time Lords
a lot. They were both entertaining and informative. But my natural
preferences lean more towards analysis (just look at what I do on
this site, after all) and, as such, I think I got just a little more
out of the essays in Chicks Unravel Time.
Of course, that doesn’t mean that these authors never do any
reminiscing. Quite a bit does indeed show up, but it’s always in a
manner that’s contextual to the topic of the essay.