The
début of a new Doctor is always a momentous occasion. It's one of
the key things that makes Doctor Who
Doctor Who. But more
than just being a defining aspect of the show as a whole, it is also
an aspect which defines a new direction for the programme—a new era
within the larger whole. The lead character has undergone a major
change, but more than that, the show itself generally undergoes a
significant change as well—in style and tone.
Expectations
are often high at these
times,
but these expectations also bring with them some uncertainty, worry,
and maybe even a bit of dread that it could all go terribly wrong.
After all, just because it has an important task doesn't mean that
the show always gets it right. Some Doctors' débuts have been
brilliant, others middling, and one or two just downright bad. Peter
Capaldi's début story, “Deep Breath”, is one that will likely
stand the test of time. While the story itself falls more in the
middling range as Doctor Who
stories go, there is so much about it that reaches for—and even
achieves—the brilliant end of the spectrum. Capaldi himself is
amazing to behold, taking hold of the part like he was born for it.
Indeed, performances all
round are of stellar quality here, Jenna Coleman being a standout in
particular. Alas, there are more than a few things that fall rather
flat, too, but overall, I think the good edges out the bad, leaving
this a story that will be well-remembered in time to come.
Steven
Moffat promised a drastic change in style with the advent of the new
Doctor. The fairy-tale quality of the eleventh Doctor's stories would
be gone, to be replaced by a darker, grimmer tone. I will admit that
I was a bit sceptical, but there's no doubt that he pulled it off. In
the early parts of the episode, there are hints of that old style,
but also hints of the new taking over, and by the end, the new style
has taken firm hold.
It's actually an extremely well done effect, providing a transition
from one style to the other, rather than just dumping the new on a
possibly unprepared audience.
One
of the things that stands out most of all is the pacing. Gone is the
mad-cap pacing of the eleventh Doctor's stories, with short scenes
jumping from one to another with little time to breathe at any point
during the episode. In their place are longer scenes that take more
time to dwell on the immediate rather than always pushing to the next
moment. There is much more opportunity to catch a breath—something
particularly fitting for an episode called “Deep Breath”. It does
benefit a great deal from the episode's longer, 75-minute length,
which provides the needed time for these slower-paced scenes to
play out. Unfortunately,
I do worry a bit that, as
soon as we're back to 45-minute episodes next week, the
pacing will become more
frantic again. I generally
found the pacing during the Matt Smith years to be rather poorly
handled, and so I really hope the better pacing of this story
remains.
That
said, slower pacing and longer run times don't always mean
everything's perfect. “Deep Breath” actually suffers from a bit
of padding in a few places—Strax's medical examination of Clara
being a key one. I do realise that the device Strax uses was the
winning design from a Blue Peter contest,
but I honestly think it could
have been included in a better way. The scene as is adds nothing to
the story—it doesn't advance the plot, provides no character
development, and doesn't even help set the tone and style of the
episode and the series to come.
Alas,
the biggest problem “Deep Breath” has is the Paternoster Gang:
Vastra, Jenny, and Strax. Particularly Strax. Now, a darker tone
doesn't mean humourless. There are some great comical moments in this
episode, particularly between the Doctor and Clara later on, and
Strax is quite obviously meant as a comic relief character. The
problem is that all humour requires an element of truth in it, and
all the truth in Strax is long gone. Characters—even comedic
ones—need to behave in believable ways or the humour falls flat.
Strax is a one-joke character, repeating the same “funny” lines
over and over again in every episode he's in. While it might have
been funny the first time, it defies belief that, after living on
Earth for quite some time, he still doesn't know what clothes are, or
the difference between hair and a hat. It's
one thing to suggest that he's not very bright, but even the dimmest
characters should still operate at the the top of their
intelligence level. Strax simply doesn't. He's unfunny and adds
nothing to the scenes he's in.
Vastra
and Jenny also remain rather one-note characters. After numerous
appearances, we still have never really seen Madame Vastra, the Great
Detective, do any actual investigating. In this story, she sits in
judgement on Clara (and by extension, the audience—more on that in
a bit), apparently being quite familiar with regeneration. We've
never actually learned when the Doctor first met Vastra, but
nonetheless, her Brigadier-like familiarity
with regeneration (“Here we go again”) feels jarring—probably
because, even after so many appearances, we still don't really know
this character very well. It goes beyond the investigating; it goes
to who she is as a person. She and Jenny are married—indeed, we are
reminded of that in virtually every scene they appear in in this
story—but we still never see any actually moments of affection
between the two of them. They actually get to kiss in this
episode—except it's not really a kiss. It's a sharing of oxygen in
a life-and-death situation. Fair enough. It works for the moment, but
it still doesn't provide the characters with any kind of emotional
reality. Constantly reminding the audience that they're married
doesn't provide that; the audience needs to see it.
Intriguingly,
Steven Moffat does seem to attempt to develop Vastra and Jenny a
little bit in this story, but he does so in a rather odd way,
focusing entirely on the one other thing about them we know—the
power imbalance in their relationship. Although they supposedly
maintain Jenny's maid role as a cover, that role carries over into
their private lives too, and the episode makes a point of drawing
attention to this, along with some rather lecherous behaviour from
Vastra—both things that
Jenny does not appear to want.
Character flaws are an important part of any character. All
the best characters have flaws, and Vastra certainly shouldn't be
without any. No one's perfect after all. But those flaws need to be
balanced and out-measured by the good about a character (the ones who
are supposed to be heroes, anyway). Yet we don't know anything else
about Vastra. We're told she's a great detective, but we never see
her be one. We're told Jenny loves her, but we never see why. As
such, focusing on her flaws makes her into a character who frankly
doesn't deserve any admiration.
Vastra,
Jenny, and Strax feature quite heavily in the first half of the
episode, which contributes to
that half being weaker than what comes later. Another
problem with the first half of the episode is the dinosaur. I like
the Doctor's sympathy for the dinosaur and the way he seems to care
more for it than the people of the city. While the dinosaur is
ridiculously huge, I don't really have a problem with that—Doctor
Who is certainly not known for
scientific accuracy. However, the episode's odd need to call out the
fact that the dinosaur is too big and then supply a non-explanation
for it (Vastra countering Jenny's comments about fossils with, “I
was there”) creates a problem that otherwise would be barely
noticeable, if at all. However,
the real problem is that the dinosaur doesn't serve any purpose. It
seems to be there for no other reason than a giant dinosaur stomping
through Victorian London looks cool. That
said, once the dinosaur is gone (and don't get me wrong, the
dinosaur's death is heartbreaking) and Vastra, Jenny, and Strax have
less of a role to play, the episode really starts to become something
special as the Doctor takes over.
As
I mentioned at the beginning, Peter Capaldi seems born to play this
part. From the opening moments, through his regenerative dementia, to
his eventual stabilizing personality in the restaurant, he takes
control of every scene he's in and makes you utterly believe he is
the Doctor. He's a more restrained Doctor, yes, even callous, but
still beyond a doubt the Doctor. He has his comic moments—some
absolutely hilarious ones—but what makes them work so well is the
way Capaldi delivers them with such seriousness. Whether he's
confusing Clara and Strax, or ranting about his eyebrows seceding
from his face, there's such conviction in
his delivery that we are
convinced by what he's doing—and that
makes it funny. It also helps that the dialogue written for him plays
to the Doctor's character and intelligence. It's truthful humour.
Contrast the Doctor's humour with Strax's.
There
are, however, a couple of oddities about her story arc in this
episode. As the companion, Clara is a surrogate for the audience. She
is the one through whom we experience the Doctor. Just as she is
coming to terms with a brand new Doctor, so are we, and we have to
learn to adjust to this seemingly new person calling himself by the
name of someone else we've come to trust and love. Clara is, of
course, aware of regeneration, and she has even met two other Doctors
in “The Day of the Doctor”
(and in “The Name of the Doctor”
she was also splintered across the Doctor's entire time stream,
meeting every incarnation, but she doesn't have clear memories of
those experiences so they don't really count). Some
have suggested that this should mean that she would have no problem
accepting a new Doctor.
However, I disagree. Yes, she knows intellectually that other Doctors
exist and has even met two of them. But on that occasion, her
Doctor was also there, and on an emotional level, those other two
Doctors seem like two completely different people. In “The Day of
the Doctor”, Clara didn't really need to accept that all three
Doctors were the same person—not in the same way that she now needs
to accept the twelfth Doctor is the same person as the eleventh. Her
difficulty with this is actually completely believable.
I'm
also somewhat divided about Matt Smith's cameo at the end of the
episode. On the one hand, it's a very touching scene. On the other
hand, it rather undermines Peter Capaldi. No other Doctor has ever
needed his predecessor to appear in order to win over his
companion—not even the sixth, who
tried to strangle his companion.
Going back to the idea of the companion as surrogate, it also has the
potential of setting back the audience's acceptance of the new
Doctor. Having to be told
this is the new Doctor might not sit very well with everyone.
As
I mentioned above, the second half of the episode is where this story
really comes together. I absolutely love the banter between Clara and
the Doctor in the restaurant. It plays out as believable interaction
between the two characters. It's funny and develops both their
characters, while at the same time setting up a very creepy scene
with the clockwork robots. I really like Clara's confrontation with
the robots and the way she not only refuses to tell them what they
want to know (which she doesn't even know the answer to anyway), but
forces them into answering her questions. Her faith that the Doctor
will have her back (and the Doctor being literally at her back) is
perhaps a little cheesy, but it makes for a great dramatic moment.
I also love the ambiguity in the Doctor's actions and Capaldi does a great job of playing that ambiguity. We find ourselves questioning whether the Doctor is lying when he says he bought the coat and clothes with his watch. Is it possible the Doctor actually stole them from the tramp? For a moment, we can almost believe that the Doctor has abandoned Clara. And of course, this all sets up the principal ambiguity: Did the Doctor push the Half-Face Man or did he jump of his own accord? When the Doctor says that one of them is lying about his basic programming, we know that it's really that at least one of them is lying, for the Doctor has killed before. He usually does what he can to avoid it (although there are some weird exceptions, see “Dinosaurs on a Spaceship”), but he has killed. Not only do we know he's capable of it, he begins the conversation with, “I have a horrible feeling I'm going to have to kill you.” (Offering him a drink is a wonderful touch.) But just because the Doctor is capable of killing doesn't mean he killed on this occasion. It makes for a great bit of mystery. I just hope it doesn't end up being overdone over the course of the series.
I also love the ambiguity in the Doctor's actions and Capaldi does a great job of playing that ambiguity. We find ourselves questioning whether the Doctor is lying when he says he bought the coat and clothes with his watch. Is it possible the Doctor actually stole them from the tramp? For a moment, we can almost believe that the Doctor has abandoned Clara. And of course, this all sets up the principal ambiguity: Did the Doctor push the Half-Face Man or did he jump of his own accord? When the Doctor says that one of them is lying about his basic programming, we know that it's really that at least one of them is lying, for the Doctor has killed before. He usually does what he can to avoid it (although there are some weird exceptions, see “Dinosaurs on a Spaceship”), but he has killed. Not only do we know he's capable of it, he begins the conversation with, “I have a horrible feeling I'm going to have to kill you.” (Offering him a drink is a wonderful touch.) But just because the Doctor is capable of killing doesn't mean he killed on this occasion. It makes for a great bit of mystery. I just hope it doesn't end up being overdone over the course of the series.
The
robots themselves, particularly the Half-Face Man, work really well
as villains for the story (although the choreography
of the big end fight with Vastra, Jenny, and Strax has issues). The
Half-Face Man makes for a sympathetic villain, striving for millions
of years to find the “Promised Land”, a place the Doctor now
tells him doesn't exist. With the great performances by Capaldi and
Coleman in this episode, I fear that Peter Ferdinando's performance
as the Half-Face Man will be overshadowed and forgotten, but he does
a great job with the being that is now more human than robot. There
are hints early on of emotion from him, culminating with him losing
his temper with Clara. For a brief part of the episode, I worried
that this was like the Cybermen in the fourth Doctor story, “Revenge
of the Cybermen”, with supposedly emotionless creatures bizarrely
displaying quite a bit of emotion, but I was happy and relieved when
it was revealed that the Half-Face Man truly has developed
emotions—from finding London beautiful to being tired of his long
life and wanting to end it all. It makes for very good drama.
And
that brings us to the closing scene: the appearance of the mysterious
“Missy”. Short for Mistress? A female Master perhaps? Or perhaps
that's too obvious. I suppose
this could make for an
interesting mystery; however, my concern here is that she's yet
another female character defined by her mystery. From River Song to
Tasha Lem (who may well just be River Song) to Amy's mystery
pregnancy to Clara the Impossible Girl, Moffat is obsessed with the
idea of women as mysteries to be solved. But perhaps this will turn
out differently. I'll withhold judgement for the time being.
On
the whole, there's a great deal to like about “Deep Breath” and
it's definitely one of the best Steven Moffat stories of the last few
years. As the introduction for a new Doctor, it has its problems, but
those are easily overcome with how effortlessly Peter Capaldi sinks
into the role. He has me excited for what is to come, and there can't
be much higher praise than that.
I want to know how the half face man a) managed to combust such a big dinosaur and b) remove the optic nerve without the dinosaur noticing and Vastra and the Doctor noticing.
ReplyDeleteMore importantly, I want to hear your view on the veil scene. It makes no sense.
"Clara: When did you stop wearing the veil?
Vastra: When you stopped seeing it.
*pause*
Clara: ...seriously though, the last scene ended with you wearing it and now you're not wearing it. When did that change?
Vastra: But YOU stopped seeing it.
Clara: No, YOU took it off. I didn't do anything. There was an ACTUAL veil there for me to see earlier and I stopped seeing it when you took it off.
Vastra: No, seriously this is, like, really really smart.
Clara: No, this makes no sense. I didn't do anything. YOU control the veil.
Vastra: Please tell me how intelligent this is.
Clara: No, I'm gonna go now."
What doesn't work about the veil scene is how it's applied to Clara and her character. She is (understandably) upset about the Doctor changing, but for all intents and purposes she is taking it very well. The only time she acts out of line is when Vastra tells her how shallow she is...even though nothing has happened for Vastra to insult her like that.
And if you watch the veil scene but lose the scene with Capaldi in the bedroom, then you'll see when Vastra removed the veil. What did Clara say or do to justify Vastra taking off the veil? What changed in the conversation.
The answer is; nothing.
Vastra LITERALLY removed the veil for no reason. Clara didn't notice the veil until the end of the argument because was angry and defending herself from Vastra's BS arguments. But Vastra literally stopped wearing her veil before Clara noticed it was missing because THAT'S HOW VEILS WORK.
What do you think
I love your continuation of that scene! I completely agree that it's an attempt to be clever and it rather falls flat. The only change in Clara's behaviour is that she gets angry (justifiably so) at Vastra's treatment of her. That, apparently, is what Vastra wanted as it somehow proves Clara still cares for the Doctor... or something like that. Vastra seems to be trying to convince Clara that the veil was never there and that Clara was only seeing it because she was veiling her emotions or something, although the easiest explanation is simply that Vastra whips it off when Clara turns her head. Alas, doing it between scenes also sets up the impression that Moffat is trying to suggest to the audience the same thing--that the veil is only in Clara's head. It's possible it's meant to be another one of those ambiguities where you know Vastra must have taken it off but you wonder, what if... It really doesn't work though.
DeleteI might edit the review if I get a chance later to include a discussion of the veil, as I think it's an important thing to discuss, but forgot about it when writing the review.
As for the dinosaur, the burning doesn't make a lot of sense, I agree, but it was something I was willing to let go. There was enough else to talk about. :)
Didn't the Half-Face Man, have some sort of acetylene-type torch at the end of his arm? I'm sure that thing could burn up a dinosaur.
DeleteI enjoyed the episode (on TV) more than I thought I would. Monday night my husband & I saw it in the Theater and were really impressed with the little things you'd miss watching on a small screen. I think PC will be an excellent Doctor. I especially like that he's not made to do the Doctor with ANOTHER British accent.
Great review, BTW. :)
The torch explains how he lit the dinosaur on fire, though not really how the fire engulfed the entire dinosaur so quickly or how the Half-Face Man controlled the burning well enough to ensure that the part of the dinosaur he wanted wasn't burned along with the rest. But honestly, I don't really think it's that major a point.
DeleteGlad you like the review!